![]() |
Innocent? |
Troubling as it may be to have something that seems so ingrained turned on its head, this process is key to the study of history, driving us on to be better historians, to always look for a fuller understanding and to make the most of the developments of the modern world to better grasp days gone by. We should not shy away from new theories and ideas - we should cautiously welcome them and then do what all great historians do; question them from every angle and see if they stand up to scrutiny. Getting it 'wrong' in History is not a crime (unless done deliberately to shape the past the way you want it) because frequenty there is no 'wrong' answer - just a differing opinion. Whilst dates and people may stay the same, the deeper understanding of cause and consequence is always up for discussion and forms the bedrock of the discipline. Whilst this new information might send Year 7 history teachers up and down the land rushing in a panic to the library and the internet to look up 'giant gerbils', we should also be thankful that our subject often never really comes to a neat conclusion - after all we wouldn't want to waste all that curiousity. If nothing else, it might help clear the name of the much maligned Black Rat and if History does nothing else than overturn historical miscarriages of justice, it is a still a valuable tool in today's 'I want the answer now' society. Long live controversy and debate - it makes good historians of us all.
S Shergold